|
Test Setup
Well, we have covered a number of features on the XPC SB61G2 and
it is time we moved on to the system performance. Since the SB61G2
is endowed with the new 865G chipset and supports the latest processors
with an 800MHz PSB, we used a new P4 2.4GHz supporting this new
bus speed as well. This CPU is also commonly referred to as the
P4 2.4C, while the P4 2.4GHz that we normally use is referred
to as the P4 2.4B and supports a 533MHz PSB only.
The main comparisons in this review would be other previously
tested SFF PCs based on the Intel 845G and 845GV, which are the
Gigabyte G-MAX FB2CB and Shuttle XPC SB52G2 respectively. Since
the Gigabyte system is the better of them both in terms of chipset
type, we will pay close attention to this system. For a more complete
performance profile, we have also included the SiS 651 platform
SFF PCs such as the ECS EZ-Buddie (D1, S4-2) and the MSI MEGA651.
Of course, all these systems were only tested with the P4 2.4B
while the XPC SB61G2 was tested with the P4 2.4C; this will allow
you to better appreciate the gains obtained by the new platform.
Additionally, the XPC SB61G2 used Kingston DDR 400 since it supported
PC3200 memory, while the SIS 651 and Intel 845G/GV platforms used
only Kingston DDR333 and DDR266 respectively. Since the Intel
Extreme Graphics engine automatically resizes its frame buffer
needs, we had to standardize the frame buffer parameters for the
SiS 651-based systems; 16MB for SYSMark benchmarks while all other
tests were set to use 64MB.
Results – SYSmark
2002 & SPECViewPerf
With the increase in memory speed and PSB, the XPC SB61G2 obtained
a 12% gain ahead of the Gigabyte FB2CB system in SYSmark 2002.
Not bad considering that we are still riding on the same processor
frequency and yet obtained such large gains via the increment
in PSB and memory bandwidth.
- Introduction
- Shuttle XPC SB61G2
- The
XPC SB61G2 - Exterior
- The
XPC SB61G2 - Interior
- The
XPC SB61G2 - more Interior shoots
- Test
Setup - Results – SYSmark 2002 & SPECViewPerf
- Results
– 3DMark 2001SE
- Conclusion
|